FIFA's inaugural World Cup final halftime show drew widespread criticism on Friday, as entertainment writers and football supporters questioned the decision to stage a Super Bowl-style production during the tournament's closing match at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. The show featured a lineup of pop performers assembled for the occasion.

The extended halftime break marked a departure from World Cup tradition, in which the interval typically lasts around 15 minutes with no entertainment. FIFA president Gianni Infantino had promoted the show as part of an effort to broaden the tournament's appeal in the United States ahead of the co-hosted 2026 event.

The Guardian and Rolling Stone highlighted concerns that the spectacle disrupted the rhythm of the match and prioritised commercial interests over the sport. Several commentators noted that lengthening the interval risked affecting players' physical preparation and recovery during the most important game of the tournament.

The reaction underscored a broader tension between FIFA's commercial ambitions and football's traditions, particularly as the sport expands its footprint in North America. Sponsors and broadcasters have pushed for greater entertainment value, while supporters' groups have warned against importing American sporting conventions.

A FIFA spokesperson defended the production, describing it as a celebration designed to unite football and music fans across the globe and to reflect the scale of the World Cup final.